Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372794›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Understanding the dynamics of implementing the Norwegian School Fruit Programme: integrating implementation science and system dynamics.

Mahshid Zolfaghari, Nanna Lien, Caroline Løvik Brandvik, Knut-Inge Klepp, Birgit Kopainsky, Hanne C Lie, Biljana Meshkovska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahshid ZolfaghariDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. mahshid.zolfaghari@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-4246
Nanna LienDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Caroline Løvik BrandvikDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Knut-Inge KleppDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Birgit KopainskySystem Dynamics Group, Department of Geography, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hanne C LieDepartment of Behavioural Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Biljana MeshkovskaDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Kreftforeningen 222357-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany implementation determinants of school nutritional interventions have been identified, but a deeper understanding of their interplay within a system is needed. The present study aimed to investigate how the Norwegian School Fruit Programme, particularly the No Parental Payment Programme (NPPP), is being implemented in schools and how it interacts with the school system structure and dynamics as perceived by school personnel and pupils. Moreover, it aimed to understand the dynamic interplay between the determinants of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in the NPPP's context.

methodThe overarching methodology was qualitative system dynamics modelling, with data collected through a series of group model building (GMB) workshops at four schools offering the NPPP. Using GMB scripts, facilitated discussions between school personnel and pupils were held for a better understanding of the NPPP's implementation dynamics and to create diagrams illustrating how implementation determinants interact with each other and each school's unique context. The individual school diagrams were compiled into a single diagram. The CFIR was subsequently mapped on to this diagram.

resultsLack of communication with pupils, the food stores outside schools, and the NPPP's design weakened the reinforcing mechanism that fostered pupils' eating of fruit. Not eating enough of the fruit increased implementation costs because schools had to deal with leftover fruit and littering issues. Implementation costs caused schools to adopt implementation processes, like reflecting, engaging, and adapting to reduce the costs, although some of these did not work or counterintuitively decreased pupils' eating of fruit. The success of these processes was contested by the design of the NPPP and mechanisms that were shaped by the goals and priorities of the schools.

conclusionsThis research employed qualitative system dynamics to investigate NPPP implementation dynamics. Recommendations for improving implementation include aligning NPPP's design with pupils' preferences, monitoring eating of fruit, and involving internal stakeholders (pupils and school personnel) for gathering feedback, and external stakeholders (municipalities) for monitoring.

Indexed as

FruitGroup model buildingImplementation dynamicsSchoolSystem dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41372794
PMCPMC12882605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.