ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Metagenomic insights into microbial communities and antibiotic resistance in treated wastewater for urban irrigation.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing reuse of treated wastewater for urban irrigation globally has raised ecological and public health concerns associated with microbial contaminations, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and pathogen dissemination.
methodsUsing a metagenomic approach, we analyzed microbial communities, ARGs, and pathogen profiles in three types of treated wastewater (W1, W2, W3) used for urban irrigation. Physicochemical properties, including nutrients and heavy metals, were also assessed to identify potential drivers of microbial and resistance patterns.
resultsSignificant variations in water quality and microbial community were observed across wastewater treatments. W2 showed the highest nutrient and organic pollution levels, while W3 exhibited elevated heavy metals such as zinc (83.37 µg/L), chromium (1.89 µg/L), and nickel (4.93 µg/L). Treated wastewater harbored significantly higher microbial diversity than tap water (P < 0.05), with W3 showing the most unique amplicon sequence variants (ASVs; 1 945, 7.31%). ARGs analysis revealed treatment-specific profiles: W1 was enriched in mupirocin and tetracycline resistance, W2 was dominated with beta-lactams and sulfonamides (P < 0.05), and W3 was enriched in fosfomycin and diaminopyrimidine resistance. Multidrug resistance genes dominated across all samples. PCoA revealed distinct microbial and ARGs structures across treatments (P < 0.05). Pathogens such as Salmonella enterica and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were abundant in treated wastewater, with Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus identified as key pathogen hubs in ARG-pathogen co-occurrence networks. Nutrients (total nitrogen, phosphorus) and heavy metals (Fe and Pb) were key drivers of microbial community composition, ARGs abundance and pathogen prevalence.
conclusionsThis study underscores the ecological risks of using treated wastewater in urban environment, particularly due to the persistence of ARGs and pathogenic bacteria. Targeted removal of nutrients and heavy metals during wastewater treatment could help reduce microbial and resistance-related contamination, improving the safety of treated wastewater reuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.