Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372748›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2025

Positive effects of a perioperative training intervention in Ivor Lewis oesophageal surgery: a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Monika Fagevik Olsén, Sara Löthgren, Ulrika Trölle, Elina Elf, Sophie Toomväli-Petersson, Michael Hermansson, Eva Hammerlid, Ulrika Smedh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03452319 (Effekt av ökad Fysisk träning i Samband Med Thorakoabdominell Esofaguskirurgi), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03452319 nacompletednot on this map

Effekt av ökad Fysisk träning i Samband Med Thorakoabdominell Esofaguskirurgi

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan2017 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsOesophageal CancerArmsPretraining, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monika Fagevik OlsénDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 100, Gothenburg, SE, 405 30, Sweden. monika.fagevik-olsen@gu.se.
Sara LöthgrenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Örebro University hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Ulrika TrölleSkånes University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Elina ElfKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophie Toomväli-PeterssonLinköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Michael HermanssonSkånes University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Eva HammerlidDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulrika SmedhDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of peri-operative training interventions in connection with oesophageal surgery have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this randomised, controlled, single-blind study was to evaluate a peri-operative physical training programme in patients undergoing oesophageal cancer resection surgery due to cancer of the oesophagus or the gastro-oesophageal junction.

methodsOne hundred patients scheduled to undergo Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy in one of five university hospitals in Sweden were randomised to a control group or intervention including respiratory muscle training, strength training, and increased physical activity before surgery and up to 3 months postoperatively. Outcome measures were physical capacity, respiratory muscle strength, spirometry, grip strength, and chest mobility. Questionnaires regarding physical activity and function, recovery, and health-related quality of life were completed at inclusion and 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

resultsWe did not find significant differences between the groups in physical capacity during follow-up. However, the intervention group performed significantly better than the control group in maximal inspiratory pressure (Δ18%), maximal expiratory pressure (Δ18%), and peak expiratory flow (Δ12%) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). Patients in the intervention group also developed fewer pulmonary complications (p = 0.019). We did not find differences between the groups in recovery or health-related quality of life.

conclusionA peri-operative training intervention including respiratory muscle training had a positive impact on respiratory function and pulmonary complications. However, neither strength training nor increased physical activity had any effects. Thus, respiratory muscle training may be offered as a peri-operative regimen in oesophageal cancer surgery.

trial registrationFoU i VGR 238,651 (Released Dec 15, 2017), Clinical Trials NCT03452319 (Released Feb 18, 2018).

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyPerioperative CareResistance TrainingAgedEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeOesophageal surgeryPhysical activityRespiratory muscle training

Identifiers

PMID41372748
PMCPMC12801523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.