Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372745›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Core values and best practice criteria for interprofessional teams in primary care: a qualitative interview study with general practitioners and other health professionals from Bavaria, Germany.

Katharina Zeiser, Dominik Weissenburger, Michaela Trompke, Lisa Schumacher, Simon Schwill, Wolfgang Ritter, Marco Roos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katharina ZeiserGeneral Practice, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. katharina.zeiser@med.uni-augsburg.de.
Dominik WeissenburgerGeneral Practice, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Michaela TrompkeGeneral Practice, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Lisa SchumacherGeneral Practice, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Simon SchwillDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Wolfgang RitterBavarian Association of General Practitioners, Munich, Germany.
Marco RoosGeneral Practice, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe German healthcare system is confronted with a shortage of general practitioners (GPs) due to demographic changes and an aging workforce. Concepts such as team-based care, which ensure high-quality primary care, are necessary to address these future challenges. This study aimed to identify values as well as best practices of such team-based concepts.

methodsWe conducted n = 15 individual interviews with health professionals primarily working in primary care settings, including GP trainees, employed or self-employed GPs, medical assistants, primary care management or physician assistant students, and other health professionals (mean age = 36.13 years, 66.67% female). The interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using a deductive category system based on prior research. For data analysis, we used qualitative content analysis following the framework method.

resultsParticipants emphasized patient-centred and continuous care as core values of primary care, highlighting the importance of establishing trusting relationships through sufficient time with patients. In this context, they rated interprofessional team-based care as particularly beneficial for patients who are chronically ill and disadvantaged. The participants supported primary care models characterized by GP-centredness and gatekeeping, a high degree of digitalization, cooperation with non-physician health professionals, and well-defined roles within interprofessional teams. They also stressed the importance of remuneration and work-life balance. To evaluate future concepts of primary care, the interviewees recommended using both staff- and patient-reported measures, as well as operational metrics.

conclusionsOur results indicate that the core values of primary care, such as patient-centredness and continuity of care, may be enhanced through interprofessional teamwork. While these values contribute to the intrinsic motivation of high-quality care, structural factors such as fair remuneration and digitalization are crucial for effective practice. To evaluate care models, the patient perspective, along with staff satisfaction and team performance, is regarded as an essential outcome measure.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHealth PersonnelInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchGeneral practiceInterprofessional collaborationPrimary careQualitative researchTeam-based care

Identifiers

PMID41372745
PMCPMC12853866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.