ReviewThe AAPS journal2025
New Frontiers in ADC Analysis: Advances in Chromatography, Electrophoresis, and Mass Spectrometry.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Recent advances in bispecific antibody-drug conjugates for breast cancer therapy.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are composed of a tumor-targeting mAb conjugated to a cytotoxic payload to enable the selective delivery of the cytotoxic moiety while reducing the side effects and immunogenicity to the patient. Since the first ADC approval by the FDA, the design of new generation of ADC products has been extensively developed to improve the therapeutic efficiency of first-generation ADCs. Concomitantly, different analytical methods have been improved to enable critical quality attributes (CQA) assessment and thus support ADCs development and production at different stages. In this context, liquid chromatography (LC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), and mass spectrometry (MS) have played a predominant role in ADCs characterization, showcasing the advantages of these methods to identify and potentially quantify the different ADCs populations resulting from the bioconjugation process. This review provides a detailed overview about cutting-edge analytical methods with a particular focus on studies reported during the last five years related to LC, CE, and MS, allowing not only a deeper insight into ADCs structure, but also to provide further evidence about their in vitro and in vivo biotransformation products. The maturity, robustness, and high throughput associated to these methods allow their progressive introduction in regulatory and clinical environments, ensuring the structural integrity of ADCs prior to their administration to the patients. The examples reported in this review article clearly highlight the relevance of using tailored analytical strategies for a more comprehensive ADC characterization and thus continue the contribution to early developability assessment and bring next-generation ADCs into the market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41372718What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.