Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372634›Full record

ReviewEMBO reports2026

Keeping up with the neighbours: local synchronisation of cell fate decisions during development.

Sally Lowell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sally LowellCentre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UU, UK. sally.lowell@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-9480

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 220298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even before the advent of multicellular life, unicellular creatures would communicate with their neighbours to coordinate their behaviours. Multicellular organisms have the particular challenge of orchestrating the differentiation of stem and progenitor cells to generate and maintain coherent functional tissues. However, stem and progenitor cells face a problem: their differentiation response can be buffeted by oscillations or stochastic fluctuations in intrinsic regulators. This generates cell-to-cell variability, which can be further compounded when extrinsic cues don't provide clear unambiguous instructions. So, left to their own devices, cells may differentiate at different rates or different directions even in response to the same cues. Fortunately, cells in multicellular organisms are not left to their own devices: they continually sense and respond to the behaviours of their neighbours. Here I discuss when, where, and how stem and progenitor cells communicate to synchronise their response to differentiation cues. I highlight technical challenges in identifying such synchronisation mechanisms, and survey emerging technologies that may help overcome these challenges.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell LineageStem CellsAnimalsHumansSignal TransductionDevelopmentDifferentiationPatterningStem CellsSynchronisation

Identifiers

PMID41372634
PMCPMC7618517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.