ArticleCommunications biology2025
Revealing site-specific molecular features mediating contacts of heterochromatin protein 1 α (HP1α) and the interactions with chromatin and DNA in LLPS environments.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of electrostatic interactions in the phase separation of HP1α and its protein binding partners.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From chromosomal protein disorder to chromatin phase separation.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serving as critical chromatin-binding effector proteins, the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family possesses distinct biological functions, of which the mechanisms are unclear. Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of the HP1 family and their interaction with nucleosomes are crucial mechanisms governing chromatin activities. Here, we first investigate phosphorylated HP1α (pHP1α) LLPS by NMR spectroscopy, confocal microscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations. This reveals that the phosphorylated N-terminal extension (NTE) and hinge region are key determinants of pHP1α LLPS. We next explore the interactions between pHP1α and telomeric nucleosome arrays and a relatively more open Widom 601 nucleosome array under LLPS conditions. The results suggest that the interaction of pHP1α and nucleosomes is driven by the self-association of pHP1α mediated by intermolecular interaction between the NTE and hinge regions and the specific binding of the pHP1α chromo domain (CD) to the N-terminal histone tail of H3K9me3 in the nucleosomes. In addition, experiments elucidate that DNA can mediate the pHP1α LLPS by competing with the NTE to interact with hinge regions. Together, our findings provide atomic-level insights into the determinants of the molecular features driving the self-association of the pHP1α and the interactions with DNA and nucleosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.