ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Tobit modeling for dependent-sample t-tests and moderated regression with ceiling or floor data.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Executive and General Cognitive Domain as a Relevant Factor of Specific Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease".Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ceiling or floor effects pose analytic challenges in behavioral and psychological research. In this study, we developed novel Tobit modeling approaches, estimated using maximum likelihood (ML) or Bayesian methods, to address these effects for widely used statistical analyses, including the dependent-sample t-test and moderated regression. Simulation studies were conducted to compare the performance of the proposed modeling approaches to the conventional approach where ceiling or floor data are treated as if true values. The conventional approach was found to yield biased estimates, inflated Type I error rates, and poor confidence interval coverage, even with as little as 10% ceiling data. In contrast, the proposed approaches with either ML or Bayesian estimation provided accurate estimates and inference results across most studied conditions (e.g., with 30% ceiling data). Real data examples further illustrated the impact of modeling choices. To facilitate implementations of the proposed Tobit modeling approaches, we provide simulated datasets along with R and Mplus scripts online. Implications of the findings and future research directions were discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.