Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372588›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Neural adaptation to expected uncertainty in neurotypical adults and high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Kristina I Pultsina, Galina L Kozunova, Boris V Chernyshev, Andrey O Prokofyev, Vera D Tretyakova, Artem Y Novikov, Anna M Rytikova, Tatiana A Stroganova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristina I PultsinaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG-Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 29 Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russia. lewiscarroll65@gmail.com.
Galina L KozunovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG-Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 29 Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Boris V ChernyshevCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG-Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 29 Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Andrey O ProkofyevCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG-Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 29 Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Vera D TretyakovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG-Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 29 Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Artem Y NovikovRSNO "Center for Curative Pedagogics", Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anna M RytikovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG-Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 29 Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Tatiana A StroganovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG-Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 29 Sretenka str., Moscow, 127051, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to adjust brain resources to manage expected uncertainty is hypothesized to be impaired in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), although the evidence remains limited. To investigate this, we studied 29 neurotypical (NT) and 29 high-functioning adults with ASD performing a probabilistic two-alternative value-based task while undergoing magnetoencephalography (MEG) and pupillometry. The task comprised five sequential blocks with stable reward probabilities (70%:30%), but varying stimulus pairs and reward values, enabling assessment of behavioral and neural adaptation to expected uncertainty. We analyzed a hit rate of advantageous choices, response times, and computational measures of prior belief strength and precision. To examine cortical activation during decision-making, we used MEG source reconstruction to quantify α-β oscillation suppression in decision-relevant cortical regions within the predecision time window. Linear mixed models assessed trial-by-trial effects. Behaviorally, ASD participants exhibited lower overall belief precision but intact probabilistic rule generalization, showing gradual performance improvement and strengthening of prior beliefs across blocks. However, unlike NT individuals, they did not show progressive downscaling of neural activation during decision-making or reduction in neural response to feedback signals as performance improved. Furthermore, on a trial-by-trial basis, increased belief precision in ASD was not associated with reduced cortical activation, a pattern observed in NT individuals. These findings suggest an atypically rigid and enhanced allocation of neural resources to advantageous decisions in individuals with ASD, although they, as NT individuals, rationally judge such decisions as optimal. This pattern may reflect an aversive response to the irreducible uncertainty inherent in probabilistic decision-making.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAutism Spectrum DisorderCerebral CortexDecision MakingAdultFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleRewardUncertaintyYoung AdultAlpha and beta oscillationsASDExpected uncertaintyMagnetoencephalographyNeural adaptationPredictive codingRule generalization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.