Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372555›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

Shining the PSMA spotlight on peritoneal metastases in prostate cancer.

Jonathan Kuten, Stephanie Chahwan, Charlie White, Audrey Mauguen, Heiko Schöder, Simone Krebs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan KutenMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. kutenj@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3458-9904
Stephanie ChahwanMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Charlie WhiteDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Audrey MauguenDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3236-6093
Heiko SchöderMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5170-4185
Simone KrebsMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9909-4531

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Interrogating the in vivo pharmacokinetics of armored CARs with radiohapten captureR37CA262557 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Simone Krebs · 2021 to 2026
$3.4M
IL13Ra2-targeted radioimmunotherapy for glioblastomaR21CA294042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KREBS, SIMONE · 2025 to 2025
$432k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R21 CA294042NCI NIH HHS R37 CA262557NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS R21 CA294042NIH HHS R37 CA262557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to retrospectively characterize patients with biochemical failure and peritoneal metastases detected by PSMA PET/CT, describe the detectability of 18F-FDG PET/CT and conventional imaging; and assess patient outcome.

methodsWe searched an institutional database for patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT between 5/2016 and 9/2024 and measured the SUVmax of the most avid peritoneal lesion. We assessed correlative CT, MRI, or FDG PET/CT performed within 90 days and validated peritoneal metastases via composite reference. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Seven patients subsequently treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 were analyzed.

resultsOf 9,877 screened patients, peritoneal metastases were confirmed in 57. Most had Gleason ≥ 4 + 3 (81%) and median PSA was 10.0 ng/ml (range 0.34–1,304); 54% were castration-sensitive. Isolated peritoneal disease occurred in 19 (33%). The median SUVmax was 8.2. Among 29 patients with correlative CT/MRI, 41% were negative. Of 14 patients with correlative FDG PET/CT; 43% demonstrated FDG-avid peritoneal disease. On follow-up (n = 42), peritoneal disease improved in 38%. Of those with isolated peritoneal metastases and follow-up data (n = 12), 58% improved. Median overall survival from detection was 53 months (95% CI: 29–not reached), and associated with lower PSA, fewer peritoneal lesions, and non-castration resistance. All seven patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 progressed.

conclusionPeritoneal metastases from prostate cancer are rare. Nevertheless, PSMA-avid peritoneal lesions may represent metastatic spread from prostate cancer, even in the absence of systemic disease. FDG PET/CT and CT/MRI often miss peritoneal metastases. Peritoneal disease does not necessarily indicate poor prognosis, particularly when isolated.

Indexed as

Peritoneal NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLutetiumMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenFluorodeoxyglucose F18gallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesLutetiumlutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetanProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticals177Lu-PSMA-617FDG PET/CTPeritoneal metastasesProstate cancerPSMA PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID41372555
PMCPMC13498614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.