ArticleEye (London, England)2026
National UK optometry clinical practice survey: implications for developing glaucoma services in primary care.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the context of insufficient capacity in glaucoma services to meet demand, this paper aimed to assess optometrists' current and potential involvement in glaucoma care, with a primary focus on their willingness to pursue further qualifications and take on expanded roles in primary care. Secondary objectives included describing professional demographics, clinical practice patterns and the availability of diagnostic equipment and IT infrastructure.
methodsThis paper reports on responses from 1009 optometrists across the UK who completed the 2023 Clinical Practice Survey (CPS) conducted by the College of Optometrists.
resultsOf 1009 CPS participants, 86% (n = 824) were primary care optometrists, while the remainder worked in secondary care and other settings. Among primary care optometrists, 33% (n = 272) reported providing glaucoma repeat measures, 25% (n = 207) providing enhanced case finding or higher-level filtering services, and 9% (n = 77) were involved in the co-management of stable/low-risk glaucoma within their practice. CPS data indicated that 24% (n = 238) optometrists plan to focus their professional development on glaucoma in the next 12 months, 15% (n = 109) plan to pursue a professional certificate, 6% (n = 53) a higher certificate, 4% (n = 34) a diploma and 20% (n = 147) independent prescribing. In relation to diagnostic tools, 94% optometrists reported having contact tonometry available, 99% had access to a visual field analyser, 42% to OCT, 57% to pachymeters and 40% to gonioscopes. Regarding referrals, 72% of primary care optometrists were able to make electronic referrals, with the most common methods for e-referrals being NHS email (44%) and referral portals (36%).
conclusionUK optometrists appear very willing to upskill in glaucoma in terms of undertaking higher qualifications, developing clinical skills, and offering relevant services, potentially alleviating significant pressure on NHS secondary care glaucoma services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.