Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372529›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Ten years of clinical negligence claims in otolaryngology: trends, costs, and preventable harm in the UK national health service.

Behrad Barmayehvar, Christopher Metcalfe, Jameel Muzaffar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Behrad BarmayehvarDepartment of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK. behrad.b@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-601X
Christopher MetcalfeDepartment of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke- on-Trent, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8790-2722
Jameel MuzaffarDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-0269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLitigation across surgical specialties is rising amidst increasing pressures on the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS). However, national litigation trends in otolaryngology, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic, remain underexplored. This study aimed to analyse NHS litigation data in otolaryngology over the past decade, assessing the pandemic's impact on claim volumes and costs. Our secondary objective was to identify key areas of concern in patient care.

methodsNational-level anonymised negligence claims data for the financial years 2013/14 to 2023/24 were obtained from NHS Resolution via a Freedom of Information request. Data included claim status, claimant age group, primary cause and injury codes, and associated costs.

resultsA total of 1,450 claims were received and 1,594 cases closed. Claim volumes declined from 2020/21 onward; however, closed claims and total costs increased, with notable spikes in 2018/19 and 2022/23. Costs were driven by a sharp rise in damages and a steadier increase in claimant legal fees. Among closed cases, 58% resulted in damages payments. The most frequent cause of claims were delays in treatment or diagnosis, while inadequate intra-operative monitoring had the highest mean payout. The most frequent injury was unnecessary pain, and brain damage, though rare, was the costliest. Six Never Event categories were identified, with retained foreign body being the most common.

conclusionLitigation costs in otolaryngology have increased despite a decline in new claims since the pandemic. Findings highlight diagnostic delays, intra-operative monitoring, and communication as key areas for improvement to reduce patient harm and legal risk.

Indexed as

COVID-19MalpracticeOtolaryngologyState MedicineAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2United KingdomAccess to informationBritish national health serviceLitigationNegligenceOtolaryngology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.