Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372518›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

HemaContour: explicit parametric contour learning for robust ICH segmentation on non-contrast CT.

Cheng Zheng, Guomin Xie, Hongcai Wang, Bingxuan Ren, Xinru Lin, Jincheng Jiang, Xinchen Jiang, Zhixiang Zhang, Haifeng Wang, Wu Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cheng Zheng *Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Guomin Xie *Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Hongcai Wang *Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Bingxuan RenDepartment of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xinru LinDepartment of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jincheng JiangDepartment of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xinchen JiangDepartment of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhixiang ZhangDepartment of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Haifeng WangDepartment of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Wu ZhengDepartment of Neurology, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China. lhlzhengwu@nbu.edu.cn.

Funding

Neurology Department of the National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project, the NINGB0 Leading Medical & Health Discipline 2022-F04Ningbo Major Research and Development Plan Project 2023Z196PhD start-up funding from Lihuili Hospital 2024BSKY-ZWZhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation LMS25H090008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate hematoma delineation on non-contrast CT (NCCT) is pivotal for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume estimation and risk stratification, yet voxel-wise segmenters often fray at low-contrast edges or near calcifications, inflating boundary errors and biasing volumetry. We present HemaContour, a contour-centric framework that fits a closed parametric spline to the hematoma boundary. A coarse CNN seeds the contour, which is then optimized by an implicit contour-regression network trained with a shape-aware objective (overlap, boundary, curvature). Refinement is performed via differentiable snake dynamics, yielding smooth, anatomically plausible contours and native access to volume and shape metrics. On INSTANCE, HemaContour attains Dice 87.2% versus 85.0% for the best baseline (Swin-UNETR) and reduces HD95 from 8.5 mm to 7.3 mm (~14.1%). On PhysioNet CT-ICH (external validation), it maintains Dice 84.3% vs. 81.8% and HD95 8.5 mm vs. 9.9 mm (again ~14.1% improvement), with better volumetric agreement (AVE 4.3 mL vs. 5.0 mL; RVE 11.1% vs. 12.7%). The generalization gap is smaller for HemaContour (Dice Δ = 2.9 pp) than strong voxel/transformer baselines (3.2-3.6 pp). Qualitative stress tests highlight fewer extreme boundary excursions at edema interfaces, improved specificity near calcifications, and stability under mild artifacts. Runtime is practical (~12 ms/slice). By re-centering learning on an explicit, image-aware contour, HemaContour improves boundary fidelity and volumetric accuracy while preserving interpretability and readiness for clinical shape analytics, offering a robust alternative to purely voxel-centric segmentation for ICH NCCT.

Identifiers

PMID41372518
PMCPMC12695867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.