Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372516›Full record

Trial reportOdontology2026

Autogenous dentin-derived membrane as a biologic alternative to collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a randomized clinical trial.

El Hussein Farag Alsayed Mohamad, Sally Awad, Mahy Hassouna Abbas, Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06615362 (Autogenous Dentin Derived Barrier Membrane Versus Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Immediate Implant), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06615362 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Autogenous Dentin Derived Barrier Membrane Versus Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Immediate Implant

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsTOOTH EXTRACTION, IMMEDIATE IMPLANTArmspreparation of dentin membrane from hopeless tooth for Guided Bone Regeneration in Immediate Implant, Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Immediate Implant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

El Hussein Farag Alsayed MohamadOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Sally AwadOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mahy Hassouna AbbasFixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Heba Abo-Elfetouh ElsheikhOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. heba_elsheikh@mans.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-9211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In implant dentistry, demineralized dentin matrix is frequently utilized as a bone substitute as it contains many growth factors. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of an autogenous dentin-derived barrier membrane compared with a collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in immediate dental implant placement in the mandibular posterior region. A total of 40 implants were placed in this randomized clinical study involving 35 patients who required extraction and replacement of non-restorable mandibular premolar or molar teeth with implants. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In Group I, 20 implants were placed immediately after extraction using a dentin-derived barrier membrane, while in Group II, 20 implants were placed immediately with a collagen membrane. Evaluations were performed immediately postoperatively and after 3 and 9 months to assess implant stability, Landry healing index, modified sulcus bleeding index, peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss, and relative bone density. A total of 20 female patients and 15 male patients were enrolled in this study. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding implant stability, soft tissue parameters, marginal bone loss, and relative bone density at different time intervals (P > 0.05). The dentin-derived barrier membrane appears to be effective for successful guided bone regeneration. Therefore, in implant dentistry, it could be considered a novel, natural collagen membrane and may represent a cost-effective autogenous alternative to commercially available collagen membranes. Trial registration: This study was registered under registration number NCT06615362 on www.clinicaltrials.gov on 26/9/2024.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationCollagenDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDentinGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalMandibleMembranes, ArtificialAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCollagenDental ImplantsMembranes, ArtificialCollagenDental implantsDentinGuided tissue regenerationMembranes

Identifiers

PMID41372516
PMCPMC13631035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.