Trial reportOdontology2026
Autogenous dentin-derived membrane as a biologic alternative to collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06615362 (Autogenous Dentin Derived Barrier Membrane Versus Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Immediate Implant), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Autogenous Dentin Derived Barrier Membrane Versus Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Immediate Implant
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In implant dentistry, demineralized dentin matrix is frequently utilized as a bone substitute as it contains many growth factors. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of an autogenous dentin-derived barrier membrane compared with a collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in immediate dental implant placement in the mandibular posterior region. A total of 40 implants were placed in this randomized clinical study involving 35 patients who required extraction and replacement of non-restorable mandibular premolar or molar teeth with implants. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In Group I, 20 implants were placed immediately after extraction using a dentin-derived barrier membrane, while in Group II, 20 implants were placed immediately with a collagen membrane. Evaluations were performed immediately postoperatively and after 3 and 9 months to assess implant stability, Landry healing index, modified sulcus bleeding index, peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss, and relative bone density. A total of 20 female patients and 15 male patients were enrolled in this study. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding implant stability, soft tissue parameters, marginal bone loss, and relative bone density at different time intervals (P > 0.05). The dentin-derived barrier membrane appears to be effective for successful guided bone regeneration. Therefore, in implant dentistry, it could be considered a novel, natural collagen membrane and may represent a cost-effective autogenous alternative to commercially available collagen membranes. Trial registration: This study was registered under registration number NCT06615362 on www.clinicaltrials.gov on 26/9/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.