ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Developing microenvironment classification models for personal exposure assessment based on global positioning system tracking data.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate personal exposure assessment to air pollution is crucial in environmental epidemiological studies, but it remains challenging due to substantial differences in pollutant concentrations between indoor and outdoor environments. Indirect assessment methods estimate personal exposure by incorporating microenvironment-specific pollutant concentrations and personal time-activity patterns, while requiring participants to record detailed time-location diaries.
objectiveThis study aims to develop microenvironment classification models using global positioning system (GPS) tracking data.
methodsWe used data from the Korean Air pollutant EXposure (KAPEX) model project, which reflects seasonal and daily activity patterns of the Korean urban population. Three microenvironment categorizations were defined: Two-level (indoor and outdoor), Three-level (indoor, walk, and transit), and Four-level (home and workplace, other indoor, walk, and transit), where the outdoor category is subdivided into walk and transit in Three- and Four-level. Classification models were developed for each categorization using various machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods, incorporating both individual mobility patterns and GPS signal quality information. Important variables contributing to classification accuracy were identified using interpretable ML or DL methods.
resultsRandom forest achieved the highest test AUROC of 0.963 and 0.958 for the Two-level and Three-level categorization, respectively, while boosting achieved the highest test AUROC of 0.918 for the Four-level categorization. Variables related to both mobility patterns and GPS signal quality were found to enhance classification accuracy. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight that incorporating both mobility patterns and signal quality into ML models significantly improves classification accuracy. IMPACT STATEMENT: Microenvironment classification models were developed using GPS tracking data to improve personal exposure assessment. Both mobility patterns and GPS signal quality were used to enhance model accuracy. Random forest and boosting outperformed the deep neural network across various outcome categorizations. SHAP values were used to identify important variables contributing to model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41372514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.