ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating psychosocial stress arising from marker-based optical motion capture and subsequent effects on gait.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical motion capture (OMC) requires participants to wear minimal clothing for precise marker placement and involves physical contact with the examiner. We investigate whether the standard OMC procedure induces psychosocial stress in participants and whether it leads to alterations in their gait patterns. Thirty-nine participants took part in a between-groups gait experiment. The OMC group wore short, tight clothing and 39 markers, while the control group wore everyday clothing without markers. Gait was recorded via sagittal-plane video, and gait features (stride times, variability, ranges of motion) were computed from 2-dimensional pose estimation trajectories. Physiological and psychological state changes were assessed using salivary cortisol and self-report questionnaires at multiple time points. Marker placement led to significantly increased negative affect and decreased positive affect among OMC participants, as well as a noticeable but non-significant cortisol response that varied in intensity across individuals. The negative psychological state did not result in significant gait differences on group level, except for late stance knee flexion during slow walking, which may be attributed to reduced pose estimation accuracy due to differences in clothing between groups. Our study suggests that OMC can be used without unwanted gait alterations due to stress at group level. However, contactless measurements that allow participants to wear clothing could alleviate their perceived discomfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.