ArticleScientific reports2025
False positive results obtained with latex agglutination identification of Staphylococcus aureus caused by Macrococcus caseolyticus and Mammaliicoccus fleurettii.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus constitutes a critical issue in food safety. A total of 180 meat samples were analysed, and 30 isolates that phenotypically matched S. aureus were obtained. All 30 isolates generated positive results in agglutination with the SlidexStaph test. The results of agglutination were verified with the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) method, S. aureus-specific PCR and sequencing of the 16 S rRNA genes. Among 30 isolates positive in the SlidexStaph test, 17 were finally identified as S. aureus, eight as Macrococcus caseolyticus, four as Mammaliicoccus fleurettii (previously Staphylococcus fleurettii), and one single isolate as Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time false-positive results of the rapid identification based on S. aureus-specific agglutination obtained for M. fleurettii. Antimicrobial resistance testing revealed a considerable prevalence of multidrug resistance among M. caseolyticus (100%) and M. fleurettii (50%). This study highlights the possibility of obtaining false-positive results in agglutination tests with M. caseolyticus and M. fleurettii. Furthermore, the presence of multidrug-resistant M. caseolyticus and M. fleurettii in meat samples may contribute to the spread of microbial drug resistance and requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.