ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental and statistical analysis of the block orientation effect on the mechanical behaviour of bimrocks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanical characterization of block-in-matrix rocks (bimrocks) remains a significant challenge in geotechnical engineering, primarily due to the difficulty of obtaining undisturbed specimens. While the Volumetric Block Proportion (VBP) is a recognized controlling factor, the specific role of block orientation is not well quantified. This study employs a systematic experimental approach, augmented by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), to investigate the effect of block orientation angle relative to loading direction (α) on the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), deformation, and failure mechanisms of bimrock. A total of 87 synthetic specimens with VBP from 0% to 50% and α from 0° to 90° were tested. Statistical analyses confirm that both VBP and α, as well as their interaction, are statistically significant for both UCS and Elastic modulus. An increase in VBP reduces UCS, though this effect reduces with increasing α. Failure analysis reveals that higher VBP increases crack density, while an increase in α from 0˚ to 90˚ forces failure paths to become more tortuous. The Elastic modulus increases with VBP, with the most pronounced stiffening effect at α = 0° (vertical alignment). This effect diminishes with an increase in α and approaches that of the pure soil for α = 90°. In contrast, Poisson's ratio showed no systematic trend, underscoring its sensitivity to local heterogeneity of Bimrock. This research conclusively demonstrates that block orientation is a critical, independent governing parameter. Consequently, predictive models must account for the interaction between block proportion and orientation to accurately simulate bimrock behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.