ArticleScientific reports2025
Growth strategy of aerial green algae on building materials in the temperate climate zone and its relevance to substrate biodeterioration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aerial green algae colonising building materials in temperate climates form complex biofilms that contribute to the deterioration of man-made structures, reducing their aesthetic value. The present study seeks to address whether algae, already at an early stage of colonisation, can adversely influence building substrates, contributing to biodeterioration beyond mere aesthetic impact. Early-stage colonisers - Chloroidium saccharophilum, Klebsormidium nitens, Bracteacoccus minor, Diplosphaera chodatii, and Stichococcus bacillaris, were isolated from brick and plaster walls, identified using traditional and molecular methods, and grown on experimental brick and plaster substrates. Over six months, algal growth in laboratory and environmental conditions was visualised and monitored by measuring chlorophyll a concentration, fluorescence intensity, and substrate profile height. All taxa were able to grow on both types of substrates at their surface and in the interior part. Most of them formed compact biofilms that filled substrate pores and overgrew the cavities, with some producing membrane-like layers (K. nitens and S. bacillaris). Algae with thick cell walls (C. saccharophilum, D. chodatii, S. bacillaris) and filamentous K. nitens detached the mineral grains from the brick surface during biofilm separation, as a consequence of prolonged colonisation over time. Except for B. minor, all taxa contributed to the geophysical biodeterioration of brick.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.