ArticleScientific reports2025
Artifact-free preparation of biological samples for SEM by optimized water freeze-drying.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Water freeze-drying for high-resolution SEM: an accessible strategy for capturing native microorganism morphology without dedicated rapid-freezing systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water freeze-drying has traditionally been considered an inappropriate drying method for biological samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) because ice crystals can potentially form and damage cell structures. Chemical fixation is also considered essential for the SEM observation of soft cells, such as protozoa and animal cells. We succeeded in preparing specimens of freshwater protists for SEM using simple water freeze-drying without chemical fixation. Specifically, a suspension of live cells in water was frozen by contact with a − 80 °C copper block using an outer cylinder that ensured precise planar contact. This significantly reduced artifact formation and increased the success rate from ~ 10% to 20–30%. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations confirmed that intracellular ice crystal formation was significantly suppressed in approximately 5% of Paramecium cells, representing a notable improvement over conventional methods. This method also shortens preparation time to 2–3 h and enables high-resolution SEM imaging of various organisms. Overall, based on these findings, we standardized a simple and low-artifact method using water freeze-drying as a novel and improved technique for SEM sample preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.