ArticleScientific reports2025
VI-OCR: "Visually Impaired" optical character recognition pipeline for text accessibility assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Developments in Research to Make the World Better for People with Low Vision.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low vision adversely impacts daily activities, particularly reading. However, quantifying text accessibility for different levels of low vision is challenging, leading to product designs that often overlook the vision status of low vision readers. In this paper, we bridge the gap between computer vision and low vision fields by introducing a text accessibility assessment pipeline called VI-OCR (short for Visually Impaired Optical Character Recognition), based on state-of-the-art OCR models. VI-OCR mimics human text recognition ability under specified levels of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity loss, to estimate whether text of a given size would be recognizable for a low vision human reader. We benchmarked specialized OCR models and vision-language models in replicating text recognition performances with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity deficits across three reading tasks: letter acuity using ETDRS charts, word acuity using MNREAD charts, and scene text recognition using complex real-life images. Comparing model performance to that of normal vision participants on degraded texts revealed major issues in some models including limited generalizability across reading tasks, difficulties dealing with severe contrast reduction, and overperforming rather than mimicking human observers. However, robust human-like performance of winning models such as Qwen2.5-VL and GPT supports the feasibility of VI-OCR in assessing text accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.