Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372330›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

VI-OCR: "Visually Impaired" optical character recognition pipeline for text accessibility assessment.

Qingying Gao, Roberto Manduchi, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Gordon E Legge, Yingzi Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Developments in Research to Make the World Better for People with Low Vision.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingying GaoDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Roberto ManduchiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Pradeep Y RamuluWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Gordon E LeggeDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Yingzi XiongWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. yxiong36@jh.edu.

Funding

Enhancing Visual Accessibility of Indoor SpacesR01EY036360 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yingzi Xiong · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY036360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low vision adversely impacts daily activities, particularly reading. However, quantifying text accessibility for different levels of low vision is challenging, leading to product designs that often overlook the vision status of low vision readers. In this paper, we bridge the gap between computer vision and low vision fields by introducing a text accessibility assessment pipeline called VI-OCR (short for Visually Impaired Optical Character Recognition), based on state-of-the-art OCR models. VI-OCR mimics human text recognition ability under specified levels of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity loss, to estimate whether text of a given size would be recognizable for a low vision human reader. We benchmarked specialized OCR models and vision-language models in replicating text recognition performances with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity deficits across three reading tasks: letter acuity using ETDRS charts, word acuity using MNREAD charts, and scene text recognition using complex real-life images. Comparing model performance to that of normal vision participants on degraded texts revealed major issues in some models including limited generalizability across reading tasks, difficulties dealing with severe contrast reduction, and overperforming rather than mimicking human observers. However, robust human-like performance of winning models such as Qwen2.5-VL and GPT supports the feasibility of VI-OCR in assessing text accessibility.

Indexed as

ReadingVision, LowAdultContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMaleVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID41372330
PMCPMC12789057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.