ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-enabled cherry price forecasting and real-time system deployment across multi-market supply chains in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For high-value perishable goods such as cherries, accurate price forecasting is crucial for the supply chain, stabilizing producer income, informing policy interventions & real-time decision support at various stakeholder levels. This study enquires whether Deep Learning (DL) architectures can be implemented in real time for daily advisory tools while simultaneously surpassing conventional statistical and Machine Learning (ML) models in predicting cherry prices. To tackle this issue, daily cherry price data from five wholesale markets in India were utilized for the period 2012-2024 to evaluate six forecasting methodologies, i.e., Seasonal Auto-regressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA), Prophet, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Transformer. The results show that deep learning models are better at capturing non-linear price changes than statistical or tree-based methods. The LSTM and Transformer models consistently performed better across all error metrics (MAE, RMSE, sMAPE, MFE, NMBE, and DA). During the 2025 cherry season, the best-performing LSTM was used as a live, web-based forecasting system that accepted real-time submissions from market officials and produced daily predictions based on field conditions. After the season, we checked the actual prices against the forecasted values and found that they were correct with more than 92 per cent accuracy for market-variety-grade combinations. In major markets like Azadpur, Narwal, and Parimpora, the sMAPE was often below 5-10 per cent, and the error margins (MAE 5-8; RMSE 8-12) were low. Further, the Diebold-Mariano (DM) test showed that deep learning was statistically superior to the baselines. The current study presents a novel and comprehensive operational methodology for advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) models in the agriculture & allied sectors of India, establishing a scalable framework for incorporating ML/DL into agricultural market intelligence and advisory systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.