ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of conditional cash transfers under the Janani Suraksha Yojana on neonatal outcomes in India's EAG states.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of conditional cash transfer programs in enhancing maternal and neonatal health outcomes cannot be undermined however key neonatal parameters such as skin-to-skin contacts of mother and newborn immediately after birth, early initiation of breastfeeding, zero dose immunization and postnatal checkup within 2 months of birth that could indirectly influence the neonatal outcomes remain under researched. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in providing comprehensive postnatal care by enhancing the uptake of key neonatal parameters in the less developed i.e., Empowered Action Group (EAG) states of India. This study utilized data from the fifth round (2019-21) of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) in India, focusing on 62,415 women in the EAG states. We employed Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to evaluate the impact of the JSY on four key neonatal outcomes. Large scale cross-sectional sample survey. A total of 62,415 women who had normal deliveries in healthcare facilities were included in the analysis. Of these, 33,623 women received JSY services, indicating that approximately 53.9% of women in the EAG states benefited from JSY. The descriptive analysis revealed that almost all the service uptake variables were better amongst those women who received JSY services. Result from PSM analysis reports as (after controlling for socio-economic covariates) - For breastfeeding within one hour, 39% would do so without JSY (T stat- 1.68), while JSY support could increase this by 7%. Regarding postnatal check-ups within two months, 42% of newborns would receive all check-ups without JSY (T stat-5.30), but JSY could increase this by 12%. Lastly, 64% of newborns would receive all zero-dose vaccinations without JSY (T stat- 6.20), with JSY potentially raising this by 6%. Lastly, no significant results were observed for skin-to-skin contact. We can infer that the impact of JSY extends beyond institutional delivery into the postnatal period in the poorer states of India. The contact and interaction of beneficiaries with health system as evident from utilization of JSY services during antenatal period seems to have lasting impact. Better coordination and counseling may increase the effect size further. Additionally, monitoring and leveraging community networks can ensure consistent support and follow-up care for mothers. Addressing these areas can optimize JSY, ensuring healthier futures for mothers and their children in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.