Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372293›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effect of different transverse reinforcement confinements on circular columns cast with recycled concrete aggregates and treated wastewater.

Abdallah M Elmasry, Mohamed K Ismail, Ahmed M Farahat, Ahmed A Elansary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdallah M ElmasryDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Mohamed K IsmailDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. mkismail@eng.cu.edu.eg.
Ahmed M FarahatDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Ahmed A ElansaryDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) and treated wastewater (TWW) in the concrete industry promotes sustainability, conserves potable water, reduces environmental impact, and minimizes waste, offering an eco-friendly alternative to conventional concrete production. However, RCA and TWW can negatively impact concrete performance, as RCA's high variability, porosity, adhered mortar, and crushing-induced defects weaken the microstructure, while TWW's dissolved salts and organic compounds interfere with cement hydration. Therefore, it is essential to fully understand their effects on concrete performance at both the material and structural levels and develop strategies to mitigate these drawbacks. Contributing to this, the present study investigated the effect of using RCA and/or TWW on the strength of concrete and the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) circular columns. A total of 10 mixes were developed with RCA replacement levels of 0%, 30%, 50%, and 100%, and TWW replacement levels of 0%, 50%, and 100%. These concrete mixes were used to cast 24 RC columns, which were tested under monotonic concentric load. The columns were reinforced with different types of transverse reinforcement-stirrups at various spacings (200 mm, 150 mm, and 100 mm) and spiral reinforcement at different pitches (60 mm and 40 mm)-to provide varying levels of confinement, aiming to mitigate the negative effects of RCA and TWW on column capacity. The results indicated that the capacity of columns negatively affected by incorporating RCA and/or TWW. In columns with 200 mm spaced stirrups, as the RCA replacement increased from 0 to 30% and 50%, the failure loads decreased by 16.1% and 29.8%, respectively. The use of closely spaced stirrups or spiral reinforcement provided higher confinement, effectively alleviating the reduction in capacity caused by the use of RCA. Reducing the stirrups space to 100 mm allowed for up to 30% RCA replacement with no reduction in capacity, and up to 100% RCA replacement with a maximum capacity reduction of around 14.9%. Similarly, the use of spiral reinforcement at pitch of 40 mm enabled the use of up to 100% RCA with a reduction of 8.6%, compared to corresponding columns cast with no RCA. Higher reductions in capacity were observed when TWW was used, which further limits its application in concrete.

Indexed as

Recycled coarse aggregateReinforced concrete circular columnsTransverse reinforcement confinementTreated wastewaterUniaxial axial compression

Identifiers

PMID41372293
PMCPMC12696081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.