ArticleScientific reports2025
Outcome centred process mapping in healthcare using random forest and process mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
System process mapping is essential for understanding complex systems and implementing effective management practices. In healthcare, mapping patient flow aims to reduce costs, improve the quality of care, and enhance efficiency. Process mining (PM) in healthcare is challenging due to the need for specialised knowledge and the inherent variability and complexity of healthcare processes. Comparing observed differences in patient flow pathways provides only a partial view; they must be combined with process outcomes and attributes for a comprehensive understanding. This paper proposes a combined stepwise approach using random forest (RF) and PM discovery to achieve outcome-centred process mapping from process-unaware systems. To this aim, we analysed the MIMIC-IV v2.2 dataset, containing healthcare data from patients at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) between the years 2008-2019. The MIMIC-IV dataset includes different types of sources within the hospital such as the emergency department (ED), patient measurements, procedures, transfer between departments, and intensive care units (ICUs). The results indicate that older patients with high ED priority and multimorbidity are particularly complex and challenging to treat, necessitating the implementation of tailored management strategies, in agreement with common clinical practice. A potential application of this approach is the real-time prediction of patients' length of stay, which could optimise clinicians' work, save healthcare resources, and improve the quality of patient care. Our approach can be applied to improve system process management by combining control-flow and data perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.