Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372287›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analysis of EST-SSR characteristics of prickly ash transcriptome and development of molecular markers.

Jiamin Liu, Siyu Zhuo, Shimin Xiang, Jin Du, Ruhan Zhang, Ailin Tian, Linyu Liu, Xinyi Cai, Zhixin Ma, Yun Ren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiamin LiuChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Siyu ZhuoChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Shimin XiangChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Jin DuChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Ruhan ZhangChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Ailin TianChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Linyu LiuChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Xinyi CaiChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Zhixin MaChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Yun RenChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China. reny1989@sina.com.
Zexiong ChenChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology/Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing/College of Smart Agriculture, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China. chenzexiong1979@163.com.

Funding

Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences Graduate Research Innovation Project CUAS-GSG2024023National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 32401627Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX1109Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJZD-K202401308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the genetic diversity and relationships among prickly ash germplasm resources in China, the number, distribution, and repeat types of simple sequence repeats (EST-SSR) loci were analyzed using the MISA software system based on the transcriptome data of prickly ash. Thirty-five prickly ash germplasms from nine provinces were selected, and 30 pairs of EST-SSR primers were randomly designed for polymorphism screening. The obtained polymorphic primers were used for genetic diversity assessment, to provide genomics theoretical support for the construction of molecular breeding system and sustainable utilization of germplasm resources of prickly ash.The results showed that from 245,286 Unigene sequences, 36,656 sequences contained 20,271 EST-SSR loci. The frequency of occurrence of EST-SSR was 14.94% and the EST-SSR distribution frequency was 8.26%. Among the repeat types, the number of single-nucleotide repeats was the highest, accounting for 44.32% of all EST-SSR loci. After trinucleotide and dinucleotide repeats, pentanucleotide repeats were the least common, accounting for only 0.57%. Among the repeat motifs, A/T was the highest, accounting for 44.11% of all EST-SSR loci. AG/CT was the dominant repeat motif in the dinucleotide repeat motif, accounting for 11.35% of the total EST-SSR loci. Among the 30 pairs of randomly selected primers, 22 pairs showed polymorphisms, with an amplification efficiency of 73.33% and polymorphism rate of 90.99%. The average values for the 22 primer pairs, concerning the observed alleles (Na), effective alleles (Ne), Nei's genetic diversity metric (H), and Shannon Information Index (I), stood at 1.91, 1.44, 0.27, and 0.41, to be precise. UPGMA cluster analysis divided the 35 germplasm lines into four groups, and PCoA further verified the classification results. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that 79.80% of the total genetic variation was within individuals, 12.40% among populations and 7.80% among individuals within populations.Therefore, in this study, the development of EST-SSR markers and genetic diversity analysis of prickly ash transcriptome provide a scientific basis for the evaluation of germplasm resources, molecular-assisted selection, core germplasm screening and excellent variety cultivation of prickly ash, and respond to the needs of multi-omics-driven breeding innovation.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsMicrosatellite RepeatsTranscriptomeChinaGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationPolymorphism, GeneticGenetic MarkersGenetic diversityMolecular markersPrickly ashTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID41372287
PMCPMC12695933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.