ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpreting visitor experiences with digital cultural heritage exhibitions in Yimeng China through thematic analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Yimeng cultural heritage landscapes are a crucible of regional identity, historical memory, and dynamic nodes in the context of heritage, tourism, and digital innovation. In the context of sustainable cultural tourism in the digital age, in general, this paper aims to explore the operation mechanism of visitor experience and meaning making of digital exhibitions in the cultural heritage landscape of Yimeng. Building on the Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception (KAP) framework, this work investigates how digital components—such as virtual reconstruction, multimedia storytelling, and interactive exhibits— influence the cognitive understanding (knowledge), evaluative responses (attitudes), and lived experiences (perceptions) of cultural stories by tourists. A qualitative method was employed, and 22 semi-structured interviews were conducted with visitors at the major display sites in Yimeng. Thematic analysis, conducted with the support of the MAXQDA software, generated five primary themes: Authenticity, Preservation, and Cultural Integrity, Emotional Resonance and Psychological Impact, Cultural Recognition and Valuation Enhancement, Community and Environmental Sustainability, and Future Directions and Enhancements. The themes present the everyday encounters and interpretive narratives that tourists create within these digital interactions, and in doing so, suggest how these technologies can facilitate cultural meaning-making, participatory learning, and emotional attachment to heritage. The findings are practically valuable for heritage practitioners, digital content developers, and policymakers who aim to develop inclusive and engaging digital heritage environments for cultural sustainability and meaningful visitor connection, as well as improved KAP outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.