Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A socio-technical agent-based simulation model for predicting smart agriculture adoption dynamics.

Yahya S Alotibi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yahya S AlotibiDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, King Saud University, P. O.Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. yalotibi@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-1538

Funding

the Ongoing Research Funding Program, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ORF-2025-1151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional technology adoption models in agriculture fail to adequately capture the complex interplay of socio-technical factors that drive farmer decision-making, resulting in limited predictive accuracy and insufficient understanding of diffusion dynamics. Existing approaches predominantly rely on static econometric frameworks or simplified diffusion models that overlook the dynamic social interactions, trust networks, and heterogeneous decision-making processes that characterize real-world agricultural technology adoption. This gap hinders effective policy design and technology deployment strategies. To address these limitations, this paper presents AdoptAgriSim, a Socio-Technical Agent-Based Simulation Model for Predicting Smart Agriculture Adoption Dynamics, which integrates economic, social, and technological dimensions into a unified framework. The model employs multi-agent reinforcement learning and socio-economic network modelling to capture how individual farmers, peer networks, and market forces interact during the diffusion of technology. AdoptAgriSim incorporates a multi-objective decision mechanism that balances rational economic reasoning with social learning shaped by trust-based network structures. Using three real-world datasets from Iowa (USA), Europe, and India, the model achieves 94.2% prediction accuracy for five-year adoption intervals, outperforming existing diffusion and econometric models. It effectively reproduces emergent adoption behaviours such as technology clustering, peer-driven influence cascades, and region-specific diffusion trajectories. Significant contributions include

Indexed as

Agent-based modelingAgricultural innovationMulti-agent reinforcement learningPrecision farmingSimulation modelingSmart agricultureSocial networksSocio-technical systemsTechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID41372278
PMCPMC12696066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.