Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A probabilistic GIS-based framework for urban flood risk assessment in Chengdu metro network.

Qiuping Li, Ting Ni, Lei Li, Hao Wen, Jiuping Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiuping LiCollege of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China.
Ting NiCollege of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China. niting17@cdut.edu.cn.
Lei LiDevelopment Planning and Discipline Construction Division, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China.
Hao WenPowerChina Guiyang Engineering Corporation Limited, 16 Xingqian Road,Guanshanhu District, Guiyang, 550081, China.
Jiuping XuBusiness School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China. xujiuping@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

Supported by the Research Center for Systems Science & Enterprise Development, Key Research of Social Sciences Base of Sichuan Province (Grant No. Xq25B09)the Chengdu University of Technology 2023 Young and Middle-aged Backbone Teachers Development Funding Program grant number 10912-JXGG2023-06691, 2023the Major Programs of the National Social Science Foundation of China grant number 22&ZD142, 2022the Research Center for Meteorological Disaster Prediction, Early Warning, and Emergency Management, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences in Sichuan Province grant number ZHYJ23-ZC05, 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban metro network is highly vulnerable to flooding, yet most existing risk assessments rely on deterministic weighting methods that inadequately address uncertainty. To address this limitation, this study develops a probabilistic GIS-based flood risk assessment framework that integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with its Monte Carlo extension (MC-AHP). Unlike conventional studies, the framework (i) explicitly quantifies uncertainty in expert judgments through β-PERT simulations, (ii) incorporates a comprehensive indicator system covering hazard, exposure, and vulnerability-including passenger flow and under-construction lines often overlooked in prior work, and (iii) provides spatially explicit risk mapping for both operational and planned infrastructure. Application to the Chengdu metro network reveals a concentric flood risk distribution, with the central urban core exhibiting the highest vulnerability despite moderate hazard levels. Compared to AHP, MC-AHP identifies a greater proportion of high-risk areas and provides probability distributions of indicator weights, thereby reducing the influence of subjective bias. Validation against historical flood events confirms the framework's predictive reliability. By explicitly incorporating uncertainty and extending analysis to planned infrastructure, this study advances the methodological rigor of urban flood risk assessment and provides generalizable insights for strengthening metro network resilience worldwide in the face of accelerating climate change and rapid urbanization.

Indexed as

Flood riskGISMetro networkMonte carlo analytic hierarchy processUrban resilience

Identifiers

PMID41372268
PMCPMC12695911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.