ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes following 1,678,872 single embryo transfers based on the Japan Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of laser-assisted incubation on bovineFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assisted hatching (AH) is a reproductive technique that artificially thins or breaches the zona pellucida to facilitate hatching. Despite its widespread use, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that AH improves pregnancy outcomes, particularly when performed selectively. Here we conducted a retrospective study using the Japan Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry from January 2010 to December 2019. AH was performed in 55.0% of 1,678,872 single embryo transfers (SETs), with higher frequency in advanced age women, frozen-thawed ET cycles, blastocyst transfer cycles, and hormonal replacement cycles. After adjusting for these covariates, the propensity-weighted clinical pregnancy rate (29.6% vs. 31.3%) and live birth rate (21.2% vs. 22.4%) were marginally but significantly lower in the AH group compared to the without-AH group. Moreover, AH increased risks of miscarriage (0.82% increase), multiple pregnancy (0.23% increase), and placenta accreta spectrum (0.12% increase). Subgroup analysis indicated that AH was effective for frozen-thawed blastocyst ET cycles in women under 35 years but worsened pregnancy outcomes in many groups, especially those with fresh or cleavage-stage embryos and women older than 40 years. These findings suggest that the impact of AH on pregnancy outcomes varies based on the characteristics of patients and ET cycles, prompting further discussion of its indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.