ArticleNature communications2025
Reading the immune clock: a machine learning model predicts mouse immune age from cellular patterns.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age- and sex-dependent heterogeneity during LPS-induced murine acute lung injury.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Article
- Radiosensitive HSPC Subsets Define Early Hematopoietic Injury and Enable H-ARS Therapeutic Screening.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Agent-based modeling identifies multiple paths for inflammation resolution.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging is accompanied by profound alterations in the immune system; yet, an accurate prediction of immunological age remains challenging. While transcriptomic approaches have yielded insights into immune aging, protein-level profiling and machine learning-based prediction tools remain underdeveloped. Here, we employ mass cytometry to analyse murine splenic CD45⁺ immune cells across various age groups, profiling the expression of 30 protein markers and monitoring age-related immune changes. By analysing six major immune subsets (CD8⁺ T cells, CD4⁺ T cells, B cells, conventional type 1 and type 2 dendritic cells, and macrophages), we extract 103 molecular features and train a machine learning model using support vector regression (SVR) to predict immunological age. The model demonstrates robust generalizability by accurately predicting age in independent, test samples that were not used during model training. Furthermore, we confirm the robustness of our model using an obese mouse model, which exhibits metabolic dysfunction-associated immune senescence. Thus, our findings establish a robust framework for predicting immune-aging based on multidimensional protein expression data and machine learning. This tool enables quantitative assessment of immune aging and demonstrates strong translational potential for identifying obesity- and disease-related immune senescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.