ArticleScientific data2025
An fNIRS hyperscanning dataset on the modulation of synchrony by social relationship during social touch.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An fNIRS hyperscanning dataset on the modulation of synchrony by social relationship during social touch.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social touch from a close companion, such as a friend, can effectively buffer stress, an effect modulated by the nature of the social relationship. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this modulation, particularly the dynamics between interacting brains, remain poorly understood due to a lack of suitable open data. We present a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning dataset from 47 female dyads (24 friend pairs, 23 stranger pairs) who jointly viewed negative and neutral images under touching and no-touching conditions. The dataset includes raw and preprocessed fNIRS data, trial-by-trial emotional valence and arousal ratings, and extensive trait- and state-based questionnaire data. Technical validation, including power spectral density analysis, confirms our preprocessing pipeline effectively yields high-quality signals. A preliminary validation analysis of the dataset confirms that interpersonal touch effectively buffers against negative emotional experiences by enhancing inter-brain synchrony. This rich, multi-modal dataset is publicly available on the Open Science Framework and provides a unique resource for investigating how social relationships shape the neurobehavioral dynamics of social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.