Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372204›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

CrossDI: A comprehensive dataset crossing three databases for calculating disruption indexes.

Shuo Xu, Congcong Wang, Xin An, Jianhua Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuo XuCollege of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, P.R. China.
Congcong WangCollege of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, P.R. China.
Xin AnSchool of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P.R. China. anxin@bjfu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-9396
Jianhua LiuBeijing Wanfang Data Co., LTD, Beijing, 100038, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Disruption Index (DI) is a significant metric for identifying research that expands scientific frontiers and pioneers new fields. Unlike readily accessible metrics like citation counts, DI requires complex analysis of citation patterns, specifically, how subsequent research that cites a given work also references its foundational predecessors, representing a paradigm shift in assessing scientific impact. Current DI studies remain largely confined to single indicators, disciplines, or databases, lacking comprehensive benchmarks to evaluate the intrinsic properties and temporal dynamics of diverse DI metrics. To bridge this critical gap, we introduce Cross-source Disruption Indexes (CrossDI) dataset, a comprehensive benchmark resource that integrates multiple established DI metrics for key articles across four fields. Curated from three major bibliographic databases (WoS, Dimensions, and OpenCitations), this dataset is designed as a reusable benchmark for the systematic evaluation and comparison of disruption indexes.

Identifiers

PMID41372204
PMCPMC12717053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.