ArticleScientific data2025
Student's performance dataset on multidimensional 21st-century thinking skills in physics ability assessment.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Student's performance dataset on multidimensional 21st-century thinking skills in physics ability assessment.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing students' 21st-century thinking skills is essential to meet the demands of modern education, support academic achievement, and align with evolving educational standards. This paper presents an open dataset on educational measurement of students' performance in critical and creative thinking, within the theoretical framework of assessing physics ability as a multidimensional construct. Our data were collected using researcher-developed instruments comprising 12 essay items. Some experts in educational measurement and physics education reviewed the instruments. A total of 330 senior high school students from three schools in Indonesia participated in the assessment. After attempting the test, all participants were given a structured questionnaire to evaluate the practicality and usefulness of the developed instruments, which yielded overall positive responses. This dataset supports the development of more effective assessment models for 21st-century competencies. It offers valuable insights for educators, researchers, and policymakers to inform curriculum design and policy development aligned with 21st-century learning objectives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.