Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41371945›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2025

Preventing Disruptions in HIV Service Delivery to Key Populations During Project Transition From an International to a Local Implementing Partner: A Case Study From Zambia.

Edward Adekola Oladele, Maurice Musheke, Florence Mulenga, Alick Samona, Ihoghosa Iyamu, Arlene Phiri, Ngaitila Phiri, Otto N Chabikuli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward Adekola OladeleFHI 360 Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. Now with Cutting Edge Public Health Solutions. edward.a.oladele@gmail.com.
Maurice MushekeCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Florence MulengaFHI 360 Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. Now an independent consultant.
Alick SamonaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. Now an independent consultant.
Ihoghosa IyamuSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Arlene PhiriU.S. Agency for International Development Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. Now an independent consultant.
Ngaitila PhiriU.S. Agency for International Development Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. Now an independent consultant.
Otto N ChabikuliFHI 360, Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office, Pretoria, South Africa. Now with the Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the management of chronic conditions like HIV, the continuity of service delivery is necessary to achieve desired outcomes, such as HIV viral load suppression, behavioral change, improved health, and client satisfaction. The transition phase-when a project closes and another starts-is a potential period of service delivery disruption. Active management of this transition period is important to prevent disruptions, especially for key populations who may be stigmatized and have limited options for accessing HIV services. We analyzed this transition period between July and December 2022 between 2 projects that provided HIV prevention services, management of sexually transmitted infections, and linkage to HIV treatment and other complementary services to key populations in Zambia. To ensure a smooth project transition, we implemented a set of interventions, including joint planning for project transition, strategic leadership, trust-building initiatives, active community and stakeholder engagement, repeated stakeholder reassurance, open communication, and transparent data sharing. After transitioning to the new project, we noted that all 3 service types of interest experienced at least a 20% increase over the levels achieved in the last month of the closing project. This increase contrasts with the assumption that all service types delivered through project structures would decline to zero persons reached within 2 months of project closing if the next project did not commence seamlessly. The decrease in service delivery was averted with the intentional transition interventions. Additionally, we recorded operational gains, such as stakeholder satisfaction, adequate assets transfer, stability in project service delivery location, and reduced personnel anxiety. We conclude that active multipartite management of the transition phase for projects is essential for ensuring uninterrupted service delivery and sustaining good outcomes for clients. Donors, health system managers, and program managers should actively require and design sound transition management plans as part of their program designs. In the aftermath of recent abrupt cuts in US Government development sector funding that allowed no planned transitions, it is important that surviving programs carefully imbibe lessons shared in this paper to protect years-and sometimes decades-of program gains.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareHIV InfectionsFemaleHumansOrganizational Case StudiesZambia

Identifiers

PMID41371945
PMCPMC12838758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.