Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41371745›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Towards interprofessional medication safety risk management: a qualitative interview study for physicians in primary and secondary care.

Anu Saavalainen, Henna Sirenius, Carita Linden-Lahti, Emilia Laukkanen, Helka Hosia, Anna-Riia Holmström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anu SaavalainenDivision of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland anu.saavalainen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9236-8699
Henna SireniusDivision of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Carita Linden-LahtiDivision of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Emilia LaukkanenSavonia University of Applied Sciences, Kuopio, Finland.
Helka HosiaPihlajalinna Oyj, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Anna-Riia HolmströmDivision of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInvestigate interprofessional medication safety risk management from the perspective of physicians in healthcare settings.

designQualitative, semistructured interview study. Data analysed with an inductive content analysis.

settingWellbeing Services County in Central Finland.

participants17 physicians working in different healthcare settings or specialties.

resultsPhysicians' overall perception of interprofessional medication safety risk management was generally positive. They considered their own responsibility for medication safety as both comprehensive, encompassing the safety of the entire unit and limited, focused primarily on prescribing the correct medication. Organisational barriers to participating in medication safety promotion comprised insufficient healthcare resources and unclear distribution of tasks and responsibilities. Personal barriers included prioritisation of clinical work, considering medication safety as an administrative task and experiencing the process to be slow and complex. Strong leadership, increased visibility of medication safety, framing the topic positively, targeted education and fostering physicians' intrinsic motivation were identified as means to increase physicians' participation in medication safety risk management.

conclusionsThis study emphasises the importance of integrating physicians into interprofessional, systems-based medication safety risk management as a core element of high-quality care. Despite recognising their broad role, physicians face barriers such as organisational constraints and limited identification with medication safety advocacy. Addressing these challenges requires enhancing their understanding of the medication management and use process and fostering shared responsibility through time allocation and interprofessional leadership structures.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInterprofessional RelationsMedication ErrorsPatient SafetyPhysiciansPrimary Health CareRisk ManagementSecondary Health CareAdultFemaleFinlandHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedHealth & safetyInterprofessional RelationsQuality in health careRisk management

Identifiers

PMID41371745
PMCPMC12699721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.