ArticleBMJ open2025
Protocol for a prospective observational study linking research domain criteria-based phenotypes with clinical and care-related outcomes in psychiatric patients and healthy controls: the VeRDoC study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach initiated by the National Institute of Mental Health provides a comprehensive framework for guiding research on mental illness and health. Since retrospective studies have indicated associations between RDoC characteristics and clinically relevant as well as care-relevant outcomes, there is a need for prospective, theory-driven investigations that systematically link a priori defined assessments of RDoC constructs to clinically and care-relevant outcomes in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective observational study assesses six domains-Positive Valence Systems, Negative Valence Systems, Cognitive Systems, Social Processes, Arousal and Regulatory Systems and Sensorimotor Systems-employing a comprehensive set of self-report and additional paradigms to assess cognitive functioning developed a priori in alignment with the RDoC framework while also assessing clinically and care-relevant variables (eg, length of hospital stay). A total of 300 adult participants will be recruited among in- and outpatients of two psychiatric hospitals in Germany (patient group) as well as from the general population (healthy control group). Including healthy individuals will allow for the investigation of continuous variations in psychological functioning rather than categorical distinctions between health and disease. Data collection includes self-reports, clinician ratings, file review and behavioural assessments. Electroencephalography is recorded in a subgroup of participants. A confirmatory factor analysis will be conducted to reproduce the factor structure and regression models will be used to investigate associations between RDoC domains and clinically relevant as well as care-related variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the local ethics committee of the Brandenburg Medical School-Theodor Fontane (E-01-20220822). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.