ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
A Retrospective Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Epcoritamab in Real-world Clinical Practice: An Analysis of 19 Cases from a Single Institution.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma complicated by cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity on day 355 of epcoritamab therapy: a case report.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of epcoritamab in real-world clinical practice. Methods Data of 19 patients who received epcoritamab at Saitama Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. Results The median follow-up duration was 5.6 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 73.7%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 47.4%. The ORR in patients with prior exposure to bendamustine was 64.3% (CR rate, 50%), and that of bendamustine-naïve was 100% (CR rate, 40%). The ORR in patients with a bendamustine-free period of ≤6 months was 42.9% (CR rate, 28.6%), while that of patients with a bendamustine-free period of >6 months was 85.7% (CR rate, 71.4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have not yet been determined, but the values prior to exposure to bendamustine were 6.6 and 7.6 months, respectively. A comparison between the prior bendamustine exposure and naïve groups showed no significant differences in the PFS and OS. In patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels of ≤303 U/L at the start of epcoritamab, the median PFS and OS were not yet reached, while in those with LDH levels of >303 U/L, the median PFS and OS were 2.3 and 3.0 months, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade ≥3 severity occurred in 18 of the 19 patients (94.7%), and in 2 of the 19 patients (10.5%), the emergence of TEAEs necessitated treatment discontinuation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurred in 11 patients (57.9%). Conclusion Careful attention should be paid to aggressive cases and those with CMV reactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.