ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Predictors of Specialty Training Program Selection after Two-year Legally Mandated Initial Clinical Training in Japan: A 10-Year Retrospective Single-center Cohort Study.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To identify background factors associated with whether residents remain at the same institution for specialty training after completing initial clinical training or choose to transfer to a different institution. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze the demographic characteristics, geographic background, and recruitment interview data. Data were collected from the institutional records and recruitment interview documents obtained during the application process. A Firth-corrected logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of training continuation. Materials We studied 261 physicians who entered the mandatory two-year initial clinical training at the Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, between fiscal years 2012 and 2021. Physicians who had graduated from Jichi Medical University (under return-service obligations) were excluded. Participants were categorized into the Continuing Training (remaining at our institution) and Other Institution (trained elsewhere) groups. Results Among 261 participants who entered initial clinical training, 123 (47.1%) remained at our institution for specialty training. The General Medicine Open Course, which allows 28 weeks of elective rotation exclusively within our institution, was the primary independent predictor of retention. Firth-corrected logistic regression identified preference for the general medicine open course as an primary independent predictor (adjusted OR: 16.25, 95% CI: 1.78-2177; p=0.009). Conclusion Preference for the general medicine open course was independently associated with continuing specialty training at the same institution. This finding suggests that training courses providing extensive intra-institutional exposure may enhance institutional retention. These findings may inform recruitment strategies and training program designs; however, validation through larger multi-institutional studies is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.