SynthesisTransfusion medicine (Oxford, England)2026
The effect of perioperative erythropoietin-stimulating agents and intravenous iron on patient outcomes following solid organ transplantation: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Solid organ transplant is associated with high rates of anaemia and transfusion, but there is little comparative data on interventions such as erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron. We conducted a systematic review examining the association of ESAs and IV iron with outcomes in adults undergoing solid organ transplant. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023474722). EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched from inception to April 11, 2025. Identified studies included adults (≥18 years of age) undergoing heart, liver, lung, or kidney transplant who received any ESA and/or IV iron before, during, or up to 1 month following solid organ transplant surgery compared to patients who did not. Article screening, full text review and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome of interest was transfusion volume, with secondary outcomes including haematological parameters, graft-related outcomes and rates of major morbidity and mortality. Results were analysed descriptively and compiled into tables, and the risk of bias was assessed using the CLARITY framework. From 1693 studies identified, 22 were included (kidney transplant, n = 16; heart transplant or Left Ventricular Assist Device as a bridge to transplant, n = 4; liver transplant, n = 2). Due to heterogeneity in design, interventions and outcomes, meta-analysis was not attempted. The quality of evidence was graded as Very Low. On the whole, a comprehensive strategy implementing ESAs and IV iron may improve haematological parameters and facilitate transfusion avoidance. High-quality prospective studies assessing the impact of protocols for haemoglobin optimisation and transfusion avoidance in solid organ transplant are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.