Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41371616›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2026

Machine Learning for Neurotransmitter Monitoring by Fast Voltammetry: Current and Future Prospects.

Cameron S Movassaghi, Anne M Andrews

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cameron S MovassaghiDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-0091
Anne M AndrewsDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1961-4833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical neuroscience wields tools to uncover the molecular mysteries of the brain. Sensors can be fabricated with properties tailored to the scales needed to decode neurochemical information. Current instrumentation is capable of measurement rates that exceed neurochemical release rates. Modern machine learning models are approaching parameterization near the number of brain synapses. Fast voltammetry has remained a neuroanalytical workhorse technique for nearly half a century and has undergone significant transformations in many aspects due to advances in hardware and computation. Here, we review current and future uses of machine learning coupled with fast voltammetry to quantify neurochemical dynamics in the brains of behaving animal and human subjects. We focus on the advances that machine learning offers to pervasive problems in fast voltammetry. We identify current challenges and limitations for in vivo studies and delineate several routes for future development.

Indexed as

BrainElectrochemical TechniquesMachine LearningNeurotransmitter AgentsAnimalsHumansNeurotransmitter Agentschemometricselectrochemistrymultivariate analysisneurochemicals

Identifiers

PMID41371616
PMCPMC12798647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.