ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2026
Barriers and Facilitators to Participating in Pediatric Oncology Rehabilitation: Childhood Cancer Survivor and Caregiver Perspectives.
Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the gap in pediatric cancer rehabilitation care: a multi-perspective survey study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and caregiver barriers and facilitators to participating in rehabilitation therapies, specifically physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology following a new pediatric cancer diagnosis.
designMultisite qualitative study.
settingTwo US academic medical centers in the Midwest and Mountain West regions.
participantsThirteen CCS diagnosed with cancer before the age of 19 years, with a rehabilitation referral, and 33 caregivers of CCS meeting eligibility criteria (N = 46 CCS and caregivers).
interventionsNot applicable.
main outcome measuresNot applicable.
resultsWe identified 5 key themes: (1) consistency in care; (2) unique needs of CCS; (3) access to local rehabilitation services in home communities; (4) caregiver engagement; and (5) costs and insurance coverage. Receiving routine care from consistent providers helped CCS feel comfortable participating in and challenging themselves in therapy. Organizational and provider supports helped families navigate transitions between rehabilitation settings. Participants reported challenges related to finding care that met CCS unique needs in their home communities and identifying providers who were knowledgeable of these needs. Patient safety and comfort were influenced by factors such as rehabilitation setting and sanitized to reflect the needs of immunocompromised CCS. Organizational and provider supports helped families with associated care cost barriers, including insurance coverage.
conclusionsCCS and caregiver experiences with rehabilitation services are influenced by supports and challenges at multiple levels, including individual, community, and organizational levels. These findings can inform current and future pediatric oncology rehabilitation program multilevel implementation and promote patient and family participation. Contextual factors that influence these efforts should be a focus of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.