ReviewJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Targeted Therapy for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.
Review in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide System in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: a Potential Treatment Target.Inflammation · 2026Review
- Targeted Therapy for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders characterized by chronic muscle inflammation and significant extramuscular involvement. A substantial proportion of patients exhibit refractory or relapsing disease despite conventional immunosuppressive therapies, necessitating the development of novel targeted treatments. Recent immunological advances have identified novel therapeutic targets-including B cells, T cells, cytokines and intracellular signalling pathways-paving the way for personalized treatment. Targeted therapies represent promising new approaches.
methodsThis comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence on targeted therapies for IIM. We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar for studies published before September 2025, including randomized controlled trials, retrospective and observational studies, meta-analyses and case reports. We synthesized evidence on the efficacy and safety of various targeted treatments across IIM subtypes and complications, highlighting recent advances and future directions.
resultsTargeted therapies are revolutionizing IIM management. B-cell-targeted therapies constitute a relatively established modality. Rituximab has become a cornerstone therapy for refractory disease, as supported by high-level evidence. Modulation of T-cell costimulation with abatacept benefits specific subtypes. JAK inhibitors show remarkable efficacy, particularly for cutaneous manifestations and interstitial lung disease. Cytokine inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors and low-dose IL-2 also show benefits across various IIM subtypes and complications. Novel mechanisms are emerging, including Fc receptor antagonism (efgartigimod) to reduce pathogenic IgG and advanced cellular therapies such as CAR-T-cell therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), which have induced sustained remission in severe refractory cases. The heterogeneous treatment responses observed between and within IIM subtypes present a central challenge, largely stemming from their diverse underlying immunopathogenic mechanisms. The primary safety concern remains infection risk, necessitating individualized benefit-risk assessment.
conclusionThe targeted therapy landscape in IIM is rapidly expanding, enabling more precise and effective management. These strategies show significant promise in improving outcomes for patients with refractory disease. Future efforts should focus on optimizing treatment selection through biomarker discovery, conducting larger randomized trials to strengthen the evidence base, and managing long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.