Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41371218›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2026

Multisensory integration for active mechanosensation in Drosophila flight.

Kevin M Mills, Noah J Cowan, Marie P Suver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How tp1, an indirect wing steering muscle, stabilizesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin M MillsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Noah J CowanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; USA Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Marie P SuverDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: marie.suver@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Cross-Modal Sensory Interactions, Processing, and Representation in the Drosophila BrainU01NS131438 · NINDS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, ITAI, COWAN, NOAH JOHN · 2023 to 2025
$5.8M
Predoctoral Training in Quantitative NeuroscienceT32NS105595 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARKUS MEISTER · 2019 to 2026
$2.6M
Mechanisms of Active Sensing in DrosophilaR00NS114179 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SUVER, MARIE · 2022 to 2024
$706k
Cellular and circuit basis for flexible control of sensory acquisitionR01NS140174 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MARIE SUVER · 2025 to 2026
$679k
NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS114179NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS140174NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS105595NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS131438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To support robust behaviors in highly variable environments, animals rely on active sampling of their sensory surroundings. Here, we use tethered, flying Drosophila melanogaster and a multisensory behavioral apparatus simulating forward flight to determine how visual and mechanosensory information are integrated and control active movements of an important multimodal sensory organ, the antennae. We found that flies perform active antennal movements in response to varying airflow and that the direction of these movements changes depending on the visual environment. Next, we found that antennal movements are amplified in the presence of visual motion, but only when the fly was flying. Through mechanical and optogenetic manipulation of mechanosensory input, we found that mechanosensory feedback is vital to antennal positioning at flight onset. Additionally, we observed unexpected changes in wingbeat frequency when the antenna was mechanically stabilized, suggesting that multiple antennal mechanosensors contribute to flight regulation. Finally, we show that integration of mechanosensory and visual cues for controlling antennal motion follows a "winner-takes-all" paradigm dependent on the stimulus frequency, mirroring visuo-mechanosensory guided behaviors in other species. Together, these results reveal novel behavioral gating of sensory information and expand our understanding of the efferent control of active sensing.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterMechanoreceptorsAnimalsFemaleFlight, AnimalSensory Receptor CellsSpace PerceptionVisual Perceptionactive sensingbehaviorDrosophila melanogasterflightJohnston's organmechanosensationmultisensory integration

Identifiers

PMID41371218
PMCPMC13012005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.