Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41370584›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025

From complaints to ethical-professional education: a study based on nursing ethical disciplinary proceedings.

Rafaela Serpa, Dulcinéia Ghizoni Schneider, Denise Elvira Pires de Pires, Silvana Alves Benedet, Felipa Rafaela Amadigi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafaela SerpaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2380-8048
Dulcinéia Ghizoni SchneiderUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4842-2187
Denise Elvira Pires de PiresUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1754-0922
Silvana Alves BenedetUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7239-4585
Felipa Rafaela AmadigiUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-1231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto identify elements that can foster ethical-professional education in nursing, based on the grounds for complaints in ethical disciplinary proceedings in Santa Catarina (2017-2021).

methodsa qualitative document-based study was carried out with data from 178 nursing ethical disciplinary proceedings, considering 33 grounds for complaints grouped into nine subcategories: Iatrogenic harm, Professional disagreements, Crimes, Assaults, Unauthorized practice, Use of social media, Inadequate medical record documentation, Unprofessional behavior, and Abandonment of duty. Content analysis was applied to systematize the data.

resultsthe articulation between the grounds for complaints and the socioemotional competencies of Education 5.0 revealed that strengthening these competencies may prevent unethical conduct and help identify elements to improve ethical-professional education. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the socioemotional competencies of Education 5.0 equip nurses with essential skills, suggesting an innovative path to reduce errors and promote a more ethical and responsible professional practice.

Indexed as

Education, NursingEthics, NursingBrazilHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41370584
PMCPMC12707537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.