ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity study of the Menstrual Practice Needs Scale (MPNS-36).
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedERRATUM.2026
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Menstrual Practice Needs Scale for the Brazilian context.
methodsa methodological study, following the stages: initial translation; synthesis; back-translation; synthesis; review by a committee of experts; pre-test; and submission and approval by the author. The committee was composed of 11 judges. Pre-test collection was carried out from July to October 2023 in a city in Mato Grosso do Sul, with 360 high school students. The analysis used the Content Validity Index and Cronbach's alpha.
resultsthe committee achieved a Content Validity Index of 96.7%, but adjustments suggested by judges were incorporated without further analysis. The version was approved for pre-testing, presenting a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78, with no doubts or suggestions for modification.
conclusionsthe cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the scale for Brazilian Portuguese were considered adequate for application in the target population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.