ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Sensitive periods of child development: a study on the construction and validation of the BASENP mobile application.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto describe the construction and validation of a mobile application on sensitive periods of child development.
methodsmethodological research focused on the technological development and validation of software, in the form of a mobile application, conducted from March to October 2023 in two stages: 1) construction of the BASENP mobile application and 2) content and appearance validation by experts.
resultscontent experts evaluated the material, resulting in a total Content Validity Index of 0.89. Experts in the field of information and communication technology obtained an Agreement Index of 0.86%. The binomial test was not significant for the majority of items in both groups.
conclusionsthe application was developed and validated with methodological rigor and may contribute to improving knowledge and care provided to infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.