ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Manual for nursing consultation with people living with Diabetes Mellitus: implementation science.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto describe the process of content validity, implementation and assessment of use of a manual for nursing consultation for people living with Diabetes Mellitus.
methodsmethodological research, with an interface with principles of implementation science developed in three stages: content validity; implementation; and use assessment.
resultscontent was assessed by seven experts, obtaining a general Content Validity Index of 0.80 and a Content Validity Ratio of 0.72. The manual, after adjustments based on recommendations received, was entitled "Consulta do Enfermeiro às pessoas que convivem com Diabetes Mellitus", organized in 67 pages, containing five chapters. Implementation took place in 24 municipalities in the west of Santa Catarina over a period of four months, and 43 nurses participated. User experience assessment was carried out with six nurses, and analysis resulted in three categories. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the manual met the proposed assessment parameters, revealing evidence and appropriating it for use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.