ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Accuracy of nursing diagnoses of hospitalized people with HIV: implications for care.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto assess the accuracy of nursing diagnoses listed for the care of people living with HIV during hospitalization.
methodsa cross-sectional, documentary, retrospective research conducted in a hospital in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Data were collected from medical records of hospitalized individuals living with HIV. The Nursing Diagnostic Accuracy Scale and the NANDA-I taxonomy were used.
resultsthe sample consisted of 101 medical records and 218 diagnoses assessed. The prevalent diagnostic hypothesis as a precursor to the need for hospitalization was immunosuppression. The prevalent nursing diagnoses were "Risk for infection" (15.60%), "Risk for impaired skin integrity" (17.80%), and "Acute pain" (5.96%), with a predominance of accurate nursing diagnoses (60.55%).
conclusionsmost diagnoses were accurate, while the null accuracy category was relevant in the sample, suggesting that knowledge on this topic needs to be strengthened in professional practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.