ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Applicability of electronic health records in the hospital Nursing Process: a scoping review.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto synthesize scientific evidence on the applicability of Electronic Health Records in the Nursing Process in hospitals.
methodsa scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, with searches in six electronic databases, restricted to publications in Portuguese, English, and Spanish from 2019 to 2024.
resultsa total of 2,789 results were found, with 33 articles included in the search and classified into four thematic categories. The countries with the most publications include Brazil, the United States, and China, with a focus on 2021.
conclusionshospital Nursing Process records are crucial for verifying care and managing risks, improving quality and patient safety. Implementing Electronic Health Records optimizes work and reduces costs, alleviating staff burden. In addition to supporting clinical decision-making, these records also generate secondary data that drives scientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.